Advanced Get 9.1 Full

Advanced Get 9.1 Full

Download File > https://urllio.com/2t9Bdm

LEADING ARGUMENT:

The majority of the courts that have considered the “related to”

argument have found that a court must consider whether the “related to”

argument is applicable only if the court determines that a transfer is

avoidable as a fraudulent transfer under Section 548(a). ISSUE 1: Whether a transfer of a debtor’s interest in a partnership is a fraudulenttransfer as to a creditor, if the creditor had knowledge that the debtor wasthe general partner of the partnership, but the creditor did not knowthat the debtor had a right to partnership income before the transfer? ISSUE 2: Whether a transfer of a debtor’s interest in a partnership is a fraudulenttransfer as to a creditor, if the creditor had knowledge that the debtor wasthe general partner of the partnership, but the creditor did not knowthat the debtor had a right to partnership income prior to thecommencement of an involuntary case? ISSUE 3: Whether a transfer of a debtor’s interest in a partnership is a fraudulenttransfer as to a creditor, if the creditor had knowledge that the debtorwas the general partner of the partnership, but the creditor did notknow that the debtor was the general partner of the partnership whenthe transfer was made? ISSUE 4: Whether a transfer of a debtor’s interest in a partnership is a fraudulenttransfer as to a creditor, if the creditor had knowledge that the debtorwas the general partner of the partnership, but the creditor did notknow that the debtor had a right to partnership income before thecommencement of an involuntary case? ISSUE 5: Whether a transfer of a debtor’s interest in a partnership is a fraudulenttransfer as to a creditor, if the creditor had knowledge that the debtorwas the general partner of the partnership, but the creditor did not 827ec27edc